Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts

25 Jun 2014

Important Notice: Storyslingers' blog has moved!

Over the last few months a number of the Storyslingers who post to this blog have had issues with signing into Blogger or browser crashes while using it. For this reason, we have relocated to Wordpress which we are already finding far more reliable and easier to use. As it stands, this blog will no longer be updated.

Please update your bookmarks and links to point to our new home on the web:


And if you're a member of Wordpress or have been considering starting a blog there, please do come over and connect!

- Storyslingers

13 May 2013

Show and Tell

It's fast becoming a universal truth, that just about anyone of a literary bent is only too keen to trot out: the importance of 'showing' rather than 'telling' in fiction. In other words, don't say 'he was an angry old man', instead describe how 'he leapt out of his mobility scooter and shouted at the children dropping sweet wrappers'.

Showing not telling is an easy rule to remember and once you get the hang of it it's simple enough to apply to any fiction you read. But I have my suspicions about it. Should something as complex as literature really be judged by so simple a rule? More importantly, are we not in danger of imposing an arbitrary constraint on our writing, and therefore putting a limit on our powers of expression - the one thing that should have no limits?

As it happens, my natural inclination is indeed to show rather than tell. This stems in part, I think, from my having previously worked as a journalist which, unless you're employed by the Daily Mail, is (or should be) about specifics - who, what, where and when - and a semblance of objectivity. It also comes from my admiration of works by authors such as Cormac McCarthy and JM Coetzee, where exposition is either completely absent or kept to an absolute minimum.

But over the past year as I've written more short fiction I've allowed myself the luxury of a bit of telling here and there, as I strive to pack as much as possible into a limited word count. Is this at all a positive development in my style, or simply a bad habit I'm getting myself into?

Ultimately that's for others to judge, but I can't help thinking that the show-and-tell rule is as much associative as causal. Just as watching lots of TV may be associated with obesity and ill health, that does not mean the former is the thing that always causes the latter.

Likewise, you are likely to find that writing which includes a lot of telling isn't going to be terribly good. But the use of telling need not itself be the principle reason it's no good.

I recently found support for this idea by reading Paul Auster's novel, Sunset Park. Right from the start this book is nearly all tell, with the showing saved for the most crucial moments in the story. And the big surprise is that it works - the prose is alluring and quickly draws the reader into an absorbing story - with the novel's weaknesses relating to overall narrative arc and a slightly unsatisfying ending, rather than Auster's writing style.

I don't doubt there's a strong basis for the show/tell rule, and for most people most of the time it probably is the best way to ensure effective prose. But even so, perhaps we should keep minds as open as possible in the quest to produce writing that works.

26 Jul 2011

Remix lit

I've found a few sites that experiment with remixing. They include stories with a creative commons licence so you can play all you like.





And to turn to music, the medium that has been remixing for the longest: here is DJ Shadow's Midnight in a Perfect World and a remix of Midnight in a Perfect world from Endroducing. (DJ Shadow's album Endroducing is composed of entirely appropriated remixed and reworked samples and was the first ever album to do so).

First is the original piece of music that DJ Shadow sampled from:


and here is Midnight in a Perfect World:


and a remix of Midnight in a Perfect World: